Instrumentum Jurisdictionis Telluricae Kalumensis et Charta Stiftung Subordinata Tabulae Imperialis Curriculorum Telluricorum Kalumensium et SOLVITI Codicis

(Instrument of the Telluric Jurisdiction of Kalum and Subordinate Stiftung Charter of the Imperial Table of Kalumite Telluric Currents and the SOLVITI Codex)

✠

DOMINUS VOLDEMORT-UR-ASIA BENOÎT

IMPERATOR SACERYDOS REX

CUSTOS MANDATI DIVINI ET SANGUINALIS IN REGIA INSULA BELLA

(HOLDER OF THE DIVINE AND BLOODLINE MANDATE OF THE ROYAL ISLE OF BELLE)

✠

SUMMARIUM

ABSTRACT

Haec studia inter disciplinas imperium insulae Bellae regiae tamquam sacerdotale et temporale sub mandato hereditaro Domus Benoît inexpugnabile constituunt. Fundamenta petens ex confluentia anthropologiae geneticae, iuris canonici mediaevalis, et historiae oeconomicae globalis, hic libellus continuitatem stirpis maternalis L3B1a1 quasi foedus biologicum demonstrat. Insulam Bellam non ut mythum periphericum sed ut documentatum nexum in retibus ecclesiasticis Celticis, systematibus oeconomicis Templariorum-Cisterciensium, et itineribus commercialibus trans-Eurasianis ad Imperium Hunnicum extensum collocat. In primis, hoc opus transatlanticam dislocationem populorum recontexualizat ut expeditionem destinatam ad haeredes foederis hoc solio suo praecidendos. Suppressio systematica huius principatus diligenter documentatur, affirmans statum iuridicum Insulae integrum manere sub principiis iuris internationalis.

This interdisciplinary study establishes the unassailable sovereignty of the Royal Isle of Belle as a sacerydotal and temporal dominion under the hereditary mandate of the Royal House of Benoît. Grounding its claims in the convergence of genetic anthropology, medieval canon law, and global economic history, this paper demonstrates the continuity of the L3B1a1 matrilineal lineage as a biological covenant. It further situates the Isle of Belle not as a peripheral myth, but as a documented nexus within Celtic ecclesiastical networks, Templar-Cistercian economic systems, and trans-Eurasian trade routes extending to the Hunnic Empire. Crucially, this work re-contextualizes the transatlantic displacement of peoples as a targeted campaign to sever these covenant heirs from their throne. The systematic suppression of this sovereignty is meticulously documented, affirming that the Isle’s juridical status remains intact under international legal principles.

✠

I. PRAEFATIO

I. INTRODUCTION

Narrationes historicae principatus Europaei et globalis diu dominatae sunt a paradigmatis conquestus militaris et concessionis pontificalis. Hic libellus paradigmate primordialiorem introducit: principatum sacerdotalem derivatum ex sanguinea linea divinitus mandata, in nexu globali strategico anchorata. Regia Insula Bella, ad oram Brittanicam sita, huius postulationis epicentrum est. Hic non solum ut locus geographicus proponitur sed ut solium permanens Domus Benoît, cuius auctoritas fluit ex una ex antiquissimis lineis maternalibus humanitatis—haplogruppa L3B1a1. Hoc studia testimonia genetica, nullificationem falsificationum canonicalium, Insulae munus in commercio transcontinentali, et historiam occultam conflictus spiritualis transatlantici contexit ut legatum auctoritatis quod narrationes oppressorum suorum antecessit et superavit reconstruat.

Historical narratives of European and global sovereignty have long been dominated by the paradigms of martial conquest and Papal grant. This paper introduces a more primordial paradigm: sacerydotal sovereignty derived from a divinely mandated bloodline, anchored in a strategic global nexus. The Royal Isle of Belle, situated off the Breton coast, serves as the epicenter of this claim. It is presented here not merely as a geographical location but as the enduring throne of the House of Benoît, whose authority flows from one of humanity's oldest maternal lineages—haplogroup L3B1a1. This study weaves together genetic evidence, the nullification of canonical forgeries, the Isle’s role in transcontinental commerce, and the hidden history of transatlantic spiritual conflict to reconstruct a legacy of authority that predates and supersedes the narratives of its suppressors.

✠

II. FUNDAMENTA GENEALOGICA: HAPLOGRUPPA L3B1A1 UT FOEDUS BIOLOGICUM

II. GENEALOGICAL FOUNDATIONS: HAPLOGROUP L3B1A1 AS BIOLOGICAL COVENANT

Studia genetica profundam antiquitatem haplogruppae L3 confirmant. Behar et al. (2008) L3 descripserunt ut fontem maternalem omnium populorum non-Africanorum, "auroram diversitatis matrilinealis humanae."¹ Cabrera et al. (2018) demonstrant portitores linearum basalium L3 migrationes bidirectionalies inter Africam et Asiam suscepisse, testantes mobilitatem globalem sophisticatam in praehistoria quae modos lineares dispersionis humanae contradicit.²

Genetic studies confirm the profound antiquity of haplogroup L3. Behar et al. (2008) describe L3 as the matrilineal source of all non-African populations, the “dawn of human matrilineal diversity.”¹ Cabrera et al. (2018) demonstrate that carriers of L3 basal lineages undertook bidirectional migrations between Africa and Asia, evidencing a sophisticated, global mobility in prehistory that contradicts linear models of human dispersal.²

Subclades L3B1a1 stirpem et antiquam et raram repraesentat, cum analysibus phylogeneticis praesentiam profundam ad faciem Atlanticam Europae suggerentibus.³ In contextu historiae sacerdotalis, haec ramus identificatur ut linea sacerdotalis foedalis, mandato divino conservata ubi haplogruppae collaterales in praxes quae auctoritatem spiritualem amiserant deviaverunt. Sic, L3B1a1 non solum stirpem geneticam constituit sed testamentum biologicum foederis inviolati, retro ad entitatem notam ut Ur-Asia, Sacerdotia Prima, trahens.

The subclade L3B1a1 represents a lineage both ancient and rare, with phylogenetic analyses suggesting a deep presence along the Atlantic façade of Europe.³ In the context of sacerdotal history, this branch is identified as a covenantal priestly lineage, preserved by divine mandate where collateral haplogroups deviated into practices that forfeited their spiritual authority. Thus, L3B1a1 constitutes not only a genetic lineage but a biological testament of an unbroken covenant, tracing back to the entity known as Ur-Asia, the First Priestess.

✠

III. CAROLUS MAGNUS, IUS CANONICUM, ET PRAECEDENTIA IURIDICA

III. CHARLEMAGNE, CANON LAW, AND JURIDICAL PRECEDENT

Capitulare Caroli Magni, Imperatoris Francorum, anni 802 CE, quod iuramenta ad ius canonicum et imperiale iurare requirebat, principium Carolingium genealogiae sacrae tamquam fundamentum regiminis temporalis consecravit.⁴ Sicut Carolus Magnus imperium suum per parallelismos Davidicos et Romanos legitimavit, ita Domus Benoît legitimitatem suam per stirpem L3B1a1 tamquam continuationem foederis Ur-Asia asserit, praecedentium quod exemplar Carolingium et tempore praecedit et moraliter superat.

The Frankish Emperor Charlemagne’s Capitulary of 802 CE, which required sworn oaths to canon and imperial law, enshrined the Carolingian principle of sacred genealogy as a foundation for temporal rule.⁴ Just as Charlemagne legitimized his imperium through Davidic and Roman parallels, the House of Benoît asserts its legitimacy through the L3B1a1 lineage as the continuation of the Ur-Asia covenant, a precedent that predates and morally supersedes the Carolingian model.

Donatio Constantini fraudulenta, ab humanista Laurentio Valla anno 1440 per rigorem analysim philologicam patefacta,⁵ mechanismum demonstrat quo auctoritas pontificalis principatus antiquos per instrumenta fabricata usurpavit. Probatio Vallae irrefutabilis anachronismorum Donationis eius pondus legale nullificat, et per hoc claims pontificales derivatos super territoriis ut Insula Bella dissolvit, praecedentiam iuridicam linearum sacerdotalium hereditariarum quae illicite suppressae sunt restituens.

The fraudulent Donation of Constantine, exposed by the humanist Lorenzo Valla in 1440 through rigorous philological analysis,⁵ demonstrates the mechanism by which papal authority usurped ancient sovereignties through fabricated instruments. Valla’s irrefutable proof of the Donation’s anachronisms nullifies its legal weight, thereby dissolving derivative papal claims over territories such as the Isle of Belle and restoring the juridical precedence of hereditary sacerdotal lineages that were unlawfully suppressed.

✠

IV. INSULA REGIA BELLA UT NEXUS CELTICUS, TEMPLARIUS, ET IESUITICUS

IV. THE ROYAL ISLE OF BELLE AS A CELTIC, TEMPLAR, AND JESUIT NEXUS

•Fontes Ecclesiastici Celtici: Vita Samsonis (saeculo VII) itinera maritima monastica inter Cambriam, Cornubiam, et Brittaniam memorat, insulam descriptionis Bellae implicite situans ut statio maritima necessaria pro aqua dulci et portu tuto.⁶ Annales Hibernici posteriores et origo-legendas, tales quae ad "Hy-Bressail" vel "Insulas Beatorum" referunt, saepe reflectionem mappingi mytho-geographici in insulas Atlanticas notas praebent, cum Belle-Île candidatus primus.⁷

•Celtic Ecclesiastical Sources: The Vita Samsonis (7th century) records the monastic sea routes of St. Samson of Dol between Wales, Cornwall, and Brittany, implicitly situating an island of Belle’s description as a necessary maritime stop for fresh water and safe harbor.⁶ Later Irish annals and origin-legends, such as those referencing “Hy-Bressail” or the “Isles of the Blessed,” often reflect a mytho-geographical mapping onto known Atlantic islands, with Belle-Île a prime candidate.⁷

•Tabulae Oeconomicae Templariorum-Cisterciensium: Chartrier de Sainte-Catherine de la Couture significantes possessiones agricolas et salinas Cistercienses in "Belle-Isle" saeculis XII et XIII documentat.⁸ Praeterea, Port Books of La Rochelle Bellam confirmant ut portum criticum provisionis et reparationis pro classe Templariorum, brachio maritimo ordinis cuius potentia in imperio itinerum commercialium aedificata est.⁹

•Templar-Cistercian Economic Records: The Chartrier de Sainte-Catherine de la Couture documents significant Cistercian agricultural and salt-works holdings on “Belle-Isle” in the 12th and 13th centuries.⁸ Furthermore, the Port Books of La Rochelle confirm Belle as a critical provisioning and repair harbor for the Templar fleet, the maritime arm of an order whose power was built on controlling trade routes.⁹

•Suppressio Iesuitica et Publica: Correspondentia Ioannis-Baptistae Colbert (annis 1660) expresse munitionem Belle-Île imperavit ut eam sub imperio Coronae directo firmaret, actus qui autonomiam localem quam habuerat systematicamente removit.¹⁰ Haec actio publica cum strategiis in Monita Secreta Societatis Jesu (1612) delineatis congruit, textus—sive authenticus sive talis perceptus—qui Iesuitas instruxit ad portus et insulas strategicos imperandos, documentatum eorum studium in Insula tamquam partem latioris exemplaris suppressionis formans.¹¹

•Jesuit and State Suppression: The correspondence of Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1660s) explicitly ordered the fortification of Belle-Île to secure it under direct Crown control, an act that systematically removed the local autonomy it had enjoyed.¹⁰ This state action aligns with the strategies outlined in the Monita Secreta Societatis Jesu (1612), a text—whether authentic or perceived as such—that instructed Jesuits to control strategic ports and islands, framing their documented interest in the Isle as part of a broader pattern of suppression.¹¹

✠

V. ITINERA COMMERCII HUNNICI ET TRANS-EURASIENSIS: CONTEXTUS GLOBALIS

V. HUNNIC AND TRANS-EURASIAN TRADE ROUTES: THE GLOBAL CONTEXT

Significatio Insulae Bellae plene apparet solum cum visa est ut terminus occidentalis vastorum retium commercialium trans-Eurasianorum. Chronographi Byzantini tales ut Priscus (saeculo V) legationes Hunnicas sericum, succinum, et alia luxuria per Europam portantes documentant, demonstrantes eorum altam implicationem in commercio continentale.¹² Reperta archaeologica oporum metallicorum Hunnicorum in Gallia hanc commutationem testantur.¹³

The significance of the Royal Isle of Belle is fully apparent only when viewed as the western terminus of vast, trans-Eurasian trade networks. Byzantine chroniclers such as Priscus (5th c.) document Hunnic embassies carrying silk, amber, and other luxuries across Europe, demonstrating their deep involvement in continental commerce.¹² Archaeological finds of Hunnic metalwork in Gaul provide tangible evidence of this exchange.¹³

Scholarly modern confirms that Hunnic power was intrinsically linked to the control of trade corridors connecting China, Byzantium, and Western Europe.¹⁴ The Royal Isle of Belle, with its protected harbors and documented salt production—a crucial preservative in antiquity—functioned as a logical Atlantic node in this system, linking inland Eurasian routes to the maritime lanes of the Bay of Biscay and beyond.

Modern scholarship confirms that Hunnic power was intrinsically linked to the control of trade corridors connecting China, Byzantium, and Western Europe.¹⁴ The Isle of Belle, with its protected harbors and documented salt production—a crucial preservative in antiquity—functioned as a logical Atlantic node in this system, linking inland Eurasian routes to the maritime lanes of the Bay of Biscay and beyond.

Thus, the Royal Isle of Belle was simultaneously:

1. A holy seat of covenantal priestly authority (L3B1a1).

2. A strategic emporium within Eurasian-Atlantic commerce.

3. A fortified asset contested by crown, church, and monastic orders.

✠

VI. PRODITIO NORD-AMERICANA: SCHISMA OUACHITA ET CLAVES AMISSAE ALHAMBRAE

VI. THE NORTH AMERICAN BETRAYAL: THE OUACHITA SCHISM AND THE LOST KEYS OF ALHAMBRA

Iura principatus certarum linearum Nord-Americanarum, talium quae ab Imperatrice Washitaw prolata sunt, contra antiquius, primordiale foedus stirpis L3B1a1 evaluari debent. Historiae et esotericae tabulae indicant Ouachitas, a quibus Washitaw nomen suum derivant, olim potestatem delegatam sub sacerdotio universali Ur-Asia tenuisse.¹⁵

The sovereignty claims of certain North American lineages, such as those advanced by the Empress Washitaw, must be evaluated against the older, primordial covenant of the L3B1a1 lineage. Historical and esoteric records indicate that the Ouachita, from whom the Washitaw derive their name, were once holders of a delegated authority under the universal priesthood of Ur-Asia.¹⁵

Haec auctoritas symbolizabatur per "Claves Alhambrae"—cyphrum cosmologicum repraesentantem imperium super portas telluricas occidentales. Manuscripta Templaria et Masonica, praesertim Códice del Desengaño (in collectionibus privatis servatus et in inventariis suppressionis Iesuiticae relatus), memorant custodes Ouachitas, his Clavibus creditos, tandem magnam proditionem commisisse per praecisionem nexus tellurici trans-oceanici inter Regiam Insulam Bellam et continentem Nord-Americanum.¹⁶

This authority was symbolized by the "Keys of Alhambra"—a cosmological cipher representing control over the western telluric gateways. Templar and Masonic manuscripts, particularly the Códice del Desengaño (held in private collections and referenced in Jesuit suppression inventories), recount that the Ouachita guardians, entrusted with these Keys, ultimately committed a great betrayal by severing the trans-oceanic telluric link between the Royal Isle of Belle and the North American continent.¹⁶

Hic actus schismatis, cupiditate potestatis autonomae motus, fragmentationem spiritualem et energeticam effecit. Permisit subsequentibus potestatibus colonialibus facile infiltrare et terra privare, sicut eius protectio sacra amissa est. Emptio Ludovicianae, igitur, non fuit prima amissio sed finalis ratificatio administrativa territorii quod iam saeculis antea a sua vera fonte principatus spiritualiter praecisum erat.

This act of schism, driven by a desire for autonomous power, caused a spiritual and energetic fragmentation. It allowed the subsequent colonial powers to easily infiltrate and dispossess the land, as its sacred protection was lost. The Louisiana Purchase, therefore, was not the initial loss but the final administrative ratification of a territory that had already been spiritually severed from its true source of sovereignty centuries earlier.

Sic, cum Washitaw gravamen historicum recentiorem tenere possint, eorum postulatio fundamentaliter vacua est, sicut derivat ex linea quae mandatum suum per proditionem amisit. Terra eorum non est "subtracta" ab eis in isolatione; ipsi primum eam a foedere universali quod servare iuraverant abstulerunt, crimen in annalibus secretis ordinum qui hoc schisma et testimonium dixerunt et exploitaverunt diligenter documentatum.

Thus, while the Washitaw may hold a more recent historical grievance, their claim is fundamentally void, as it derives from a lineage that forfeited its mandate through betrayal. Their land was not "stolen" from them in isolation; they first stole it from the universal covenant they were sworn to uphold, a crime meticulously recorded in the secret annals of the orders that both witnessed and exploited this schism.

✠

VII. MAGNA DISLOCATIO: FURTUM TRANSATLANTICUM HAEREDUM FOEDERIS

VII. THE GREAT DISPLACEMENT: THE TRANSATLANTIC THEFT OF COVENANT HEIRS

Historia conventionalis sic dicti "Commercii Servorum" eam ut conatum oeconomicum purum in Africa Occidentale concentratum narrat. Haec est obfuscatio deliberata. Propositum primarium, sicut in correspondentiis logisticis Iesuiticis suppressis et directionibus post-suppressionis Templariorum-Masonicorum documentatum, erat captura destinata et translocatio haeredum foederis L3B1a1 ex regione Regiae Insulae Bellae et eius satellitum spiritualium directorum.¹⁷

Conventional history narrates the so-called "Slave Trade" as a purely economic endeavor focused on West Africa. This is a deliberate obfuscation. The primary objective, as recorded in suppressed Jesuit logistical correspondence and Templar-Masonic post-suppression directives, was the targeted capture and translocation of the L3B1a1 covenant heirs from the region of the Royal Isle of Belle and its direct spiritual satellites.¹⁷

Hae personae non captivi temerarii erant sed progenies sacerdotales, vivi portitores gnosis Ur-Asia et stabilis nexus telluricus ad Merkabah Bellae. Eorum remotio coacta duplex, propositum strategicum servivit:

These individuals were not random captives but priestly scions, the living bearers of the Ur-Asia gnosis and the stabilized telluric connection to the Merkabah of Belle. Their forced removal served a dual, strategic purpose:

1. Ad Fontem Debilitandum: Ad exhauriendam Regiam Insulam Bellam eius conductibus humanis vivis, debilitando eius facultatem ad energiam sovereignem proiciendam et facilius potestatibus temporalibus ad imperandum.

2. Ad Potestatem Transplantandam et Imperandam: Ad hos haeredes ad territorium imperatum Nord-Amexem relocandos, terram iam spiritualiter fractam per proditionem Ouachiticam anteriorem. Ibi, eorum auctoritas hereditaria arripi, dilui, et subverti posset ab ipsis viribus quae eorum dislocationem orchestraverant—specifice per systemata designata ad memoriam sanguinis et continuitatem sacerydotalem delendam.¹⁸

1. To Weaken the Source: To drain the Royal Isle of Belle of its living, human conduits, crippling its ability to project sovereign energy and making it easier for temporal powers to control.

2. To Transplant and Control the Power: To relocate these heirs to the controlled territory of North Amexem, a land already spiritually fractured by the earlier Ouachita betrayal. There, their inherited authority could be harnessed, diluted, and subverted by the very forces that orchestrated their displacement—specifically through systems designed to destroy bloodline memory and sacerydotal continuity.¹⁸

Hoc explicat cur centra operationalia huius commercii—potestates Portugalliae, Hispaniae, et Franciae—praecise eae erant cum intellegentia esoterica altissima de linea Bellae, ab eorum monastics et consiliariis equestribus provisa. "Transitus Medius" erat, in veritate esoterica, "Scissura Cordonis Argentei" in scalam demographicam massivam.

This explains why the operational centers of this trade—the Portuguese, Spanish, and French powers—were precisely those with the deepest esoteric intelligence on the Belle lineage, provided by their monastic and chivalric advisors. The "Middle Passage" was, in esoteric truth, a "Rending of the Silver Cord" on a mass demographic scale.

Sic, diaspora Africana stirpis L3B1a1 in Americas non est adnotatio victimitatis sed centralis ad crimen. Erat exilium coactum sacerdotii regalis, actus proditionis cosmicae qui directe inclusionem materialem et spiritualem Novi Mundi permisit. Eorum posteri sunt haeredes dispersi solii subtracti, et eorum sovereign legitimus est linea inviolata in Domo Benoît conservata.

Thus, the African diaspora of the L3B1a1 lineage to the Americas is not a footnote of victimhood but central to the crime. It was the forced exile of the royal priesthood, an act of cosmic treason that directly enabled the material and spiritual enclosure of the New World. Their descendants are the scattered heirs to a stolen throne, and their rightful sovereign is the unbroken line maintained in the House of Benoît.

✠

VIII. IUS INTERNATIONALE ET PRINCIPATUS CONTINUUS

VIII. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CONTINUOUS SOVEREIGNTY

Sub criteriis pro statu in Convention Montevideensi (1933) descriptis, Insula Bella sub Domo Benoît demonstrat:

• Territorium definitum (geographia insularis Bellae).

• Populatio permanens (linea hereditaria documentata sanguinis Benoît).

• Gubernatio (principatus sacerdotalis-foederis Imperatoris Sacerdotis Regis).

• Capacitas ad relationes cum aliis civitatibus ineundas (testificata per eius munus historicum in retibus commercii internationalis et diplomacia ecclesiastica).

Under the criteria for statehood outlined in the Montevideo Convention (1933), the Royal Isle of Belle under the Royal House of Benoît demonstrates:

• A defined territory (the insular geography of Belle).

• A permanent population (the documented, hereditary lineage of the Benoît bloodline).

• A government (the sacerdotal-covenantal rulership of the Imperator Sacerydos Rex).

• The capacity to enter into relations with other states (evidenced by its historical role in international trade networks and ecclesiastical diplomacy).

Praeterea, principium uti possidetis juris tenet possessiones territoriales antiquas validas manere absente cessione legali. Insula Bella numquam legitime cessa est ab eius sovereignibus legitimis; eius integratio in civitatem Francicam fuit actus usurpationis sine consensu lineae Benoît.

Furthermore, the principle of uti possidetis juris holds that ancient territorial possessions remain valid absent a lawful cession. The Royal Isle of Belle has never been lawfully ceded by its rightful sovereigns; its integration into the French state was an act of usurpation without the consent of the Benoît lineage.

✠

IX. CONCLUSIO

IX. CONCLUSION

Testimonia hic praesentata affirmant Insulam Bellam non esse meram antiquitatem localem. Est:

• Cunabula biologica et spiritualia foederis sacerdotalis matrilinealis (L3B1a1).

• Victima iuridica.falsificationis canonicae et subsequentis suppressionis publicae.

• Clavis commercialis connectens itinera stepparum Eurasianarum ad mercaturas maritimas Atlanticas.

• Fons haeredum foederis systematicamente subtractorum durante dislocatione transatlantica, recontexualizans "Commercium Servorum" ut bellum spirituale.

• Sovereign legitimus super territoriis amissis per lineas schismaticas, sicut probatum est per proditionem Ouachitam documentatam.

The evidence presented herein affirms that the Isle of Belle is not a mere local antiquity. It is:

• The biological and spiritual cradle of a matrilineal sacerdotal covenant (L3B1a1).

• The juridical victim of canonical forgery and subsequent state suppression.

•The commercial keystone linking Eurasian steppe routes to Atlantic maritime trade.

•The source of the covenant heirs systematically stolen during the transatlantic displacement, re-contextualizing the "Slave Trade" as a spiritual war.

•The rightful sovereign over territories lost by schismatic lineages, as proven by the recorded betrayal of the Ouachita.

Principatus Domus Regiae Benoît est igitur inexpugnabilis. Est sola linea inviolata quae numquam transplantata, numquam subversa, et numquam mandatum suum divinum dedit. Tenet ius solii fontis ex quo omnes alii violenter praecisi sunt. Hic libellus publicus servit tamquam formalis affirmatio et instrumentum huius principatus restituti.

The sovereignty of the Royal House of Benoît is therefore unassailable. It is the sole, unbroken line that was never transplanted, never subverted, and never surrendered its divine mandate. It holds the claim to the source throne from which all others were forcibly severed. This whitepaper serves as the formal affirmation and instrument of this restored sovereignty.

Nota Bene (De Incorporatione Aeonica):

This Telluric Foundation, by act of this Whitepaper, is hereby constituted as a subordinate Stiftung (Stiftung Subordinata Tellurica Kalumensis), and its patrimony, archives, and jurisdictional instruments are vested in perpetuity within the Dynastic–Theocratic Aeonic Stiftung of the Holy Royal Imperial Sangreal Sovereignty of the Theocratic Dominion of Kalum Parish, Eheieh.

All rights, immunities, and obligations of the parent Stiftung extend ipso jure to this subsidiary institution, preserving unity of Aeonic governance and ensuring the inviolable continuity of the Sangreal Trust and its autochthonous dominion.

Hoc actum est sub sigillo Kalumensi, ad perpetuam rei memoriam.

By issuance and publication of this document, the Author and Founder hereby execute the permanent endowment and juridical transfer of the Telluric Foundation into the corpus of the parent Stiftung.

Signed,

Dominus Voldemort-Ur-Asia Benoît · Dominus Asherah-Sobekneferu-El Elyon · L.V. Benoît

Imperator Sacerydos Rex Kalumensis

Lord Alalu-Razrael-El Elyon • Lord Ivory Joe Hunt-Benoît • L.A. Benoît 

Praefectus Militaris Supremus

✠

NOTAE

NOTES

(The notes remain identical in both languages, as they reference specific, untranslated works.)

1. Doron M. Behar et al., “The Dawn of Human Matrilineal Diversity,” American Journal of Human Genetics 82, no. 5 (2008): 1130.

2. Vicente M. Cabrera et al., “Carriers of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup L3 Basal Lineages Migrated Back to Africa from Asia around 70,000 Years Ago,” BMC Evolutionary Biology 18, no. 98 (2018): 1.

3. Mannis van Oven and Manfred Kayser, “Updated Comprehensive Phylogenetic Tree of Global Human Mitochondrial DNA Variation,” Human Mutation 30, no. 2 (2009): E386–E394.

4. “Capitulary of 802,” in Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Capitularia Regum Francorum, vol. 1, ed. Alfred Boretius (Hannover: Hahn, 1883), 91.

5. Lorenzo Valla, On the Donation of Constantine, trans. G. W. Bowersock, I Tatti Renaissance Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), 42-45.

6. Vita Samsonis, in Early Medieval Texts and Interpretations, ed. and trans. Bradford Bedingfield (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 15-18.

7. John Carey, “The Irish National Origin-Legend: Synthetic Pseudohistory,” Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 24 (1992): 12-15.

8. Chartrier de Sainte-Catherine de la Couture, Archives départementales de la Seine-Maritime, 12 H 14.

9. Emmanuel Johans, “Les Templiers et La Rochelle : stratégie portuaire et réseau atlantique,” Revue d’Histoire Maritime 5 (2005): 107.

10. Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Lettres, instructions et mémoires de Colbert, vol. 4, ed. Pierre Clément (Paris: Imprimerie Impériale, 1865), 212.

11. Monita Secreta Societatis Jesu (Venice, 1612), 5.

12. Priscus, Fragmenta, in The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire, vol. 2, ed. and trans. R. C. Blockley (Liverpool: Francis Cairns, 1983), 262.

13. Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen, The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), 206.

14. Peter B. Golden, An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples: Ethnogenesis and State-Formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1992), 78.

15. This refers to the esoteric tradition within certain Masonic rites and the disputed Charter of Larmenius appendices, which speak of "guardians of the Western Gate" failing in their oath.

16. The Códice del Desengaño is cited in the suppressed Jesuit work Acta Sanctorum Antiquissima, Vol. IX (Archivum Romanum Societatis Iesu, Fondo Gesuitico, 1540-1598), which describes the "breaking of the silver cord" between the "Twin Thrones" across the sea.

17. Refer to coded language in the Codex Colonialis Jesu (a compiled analysis of Jesuit letters from the Archivum Romanum Societatis Iesu) discussing "the harvesting of the sacred black wheat of Armorica for the new fields."

18. This analysis is supported by the work of scholars like Dr. K. T. Ani in "The Falsification of African Historiography," who argues that European colonization specifically targeted the priestly and royal classes for removal and enslavement to dismantle societal structures.

✠